by
Wow – that is extremely impressive! I’ve had children collaborating where they were each writing their own part and correcting each other’s typos and grammar, but never seen them deliberately take on specific roles like that. Fantastic!
I do think children are very good at adapting to working this way – they enjoy working together ad I think are quite aware of their strengths and weaknesses to help them work as a team. Also seen them using the chat feature to tell someone to find a picture, or to say “great work” etc.
My only problem was when one child kept on deleting the group’s work – I wasn’t sure whether it was by accident or deliberately – and that caused a lot of upset for them so in the end I had to move him away from the computer so that he couldn’t keep doing it.
I find it fascinating how children approach these areas. The more I work on child initiated learning the more I see that it is group dynamics that a huge number of children want to use to persue their learning. This is something our system really doesn’t cater for. I found Ewan McIntosh’s talk here: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TLitA8PuGlw really influenced my thinking on this. Children seem to naturally ‘get’ Participation culture and group mindsets very quickly, whereas those of us conditioned towards individualisation of our learning and work take a lot longer to get on board with them. Another thing we are currently ‘educating out of’ children?
Absolutely, Oliver: children really are ‘wired differently’, and I think we need to be aware of this if we hope to fully engage them. I’m not certain that it’s always a better way, however: when I watch my own teenage children working, they are likely to have many different communication channels open (YouTube, FB, Google, Wikipedia, iTunes etc.), which I certainly could not do as easily as they do, and yet they seem to be able to cope and are doing well according to the usual school benchmarks. I do worry that it’s leading to a trivial, dilettante approach and the assembly of content rather real understanding, but I can’t offer any evidence of this. Maybe their way really is better in the sense that it is more suited for the world in which they will have to operate.
To return to your point, I have also concluded that children take naturally to collaborative working, without seeing it as anything special. Maybe they’re better-equipped to know how to tackle problems than we give them credit for, and maybe we’re the ones who need to learn how to work effectively.
You make an interesting point Mark. I wonder if they are ‘wired differently’ or it is something that happens as they mature that either reduces this ability, or if it is something that their experience guides them away from. Possibly this could be likened to how Ken Robinson talks about creativity- something that is educated out of children?
Having said that, when reading my blogs from #tmm11 many people have asked if I was able to actually listen to the talks whilst doing this. Obviously I was as I was writing about them- so perhaps it is about getting in the right mindset and training yourself, which I have likely done at other events when tweeting and listening. I think it’s about knowing when you can afford to divert your attention slightly, and when things need your entire attention as well. I find it hard to believe that people can make those judgements without experience.
Collaboration is quite a natural state when you think about it- perhaps this is another case of certain experiences conditioning people away from it.
[…] This month I started to notice my work on collaborative and independent learning with my class paying off, with children using Google Docs to structure their collaboration. […]
Leave a Reply